What is Intelligence?

Merriam-Webster Dictionary has the following:

a
(1)
: the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : REASON
also : the skilled use of reason
(2)
: the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one’s environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (such as tests)
b
: mental acuteness : SHREWDNESS


These are outlines only. the word ‘how’ apparently is missing in paragraph 1 between ‘or’ and ‘to’.
Interesting. I have a few questions:
1. Where does this ‘ability’ come from? How do you know how to confront a ‘new’ problem and solve it?
2. Can a ‘machine’, for example, a so-called ‘AI’ system react and resolve a new problem?

In us, as humans, there is a payback, or deficit, from making a decision, about a given scenario.
These ‘results’ positive, or negative are remembered, and become part of us.
No, not in your ‘gut’, but I do admit to having that sensation, which is common to all os, but the scenario, and it’s outcome, good, bad, or indifferent is held in the subconscious.

In so-called AI, ‘LLM’ ‘Large Language Models’ are used to compare patterns, whether they be of text, or images. No ‘meta’ information regarding how the machine feels about either the images or text is held, unless ‘feeling’ is coded alongside it regarding the HUMAN reaction to it – this is added as ‘slop’ from reports, if any, regarding the informational content.
So the AI system is a huge library of mostly dross, scraped from the web, adorned with the aggregated comments of those ‘good’ folks that reacted to it in the first place.

IOW A Bag of Shit.

What is a ‘comment’?

Well, I found one complete answer that coincides exactly with my understanding of the word What is a comment?

Now it is rare that I make comments on any of my Blog posts, but yes there are ‘odd’ cases. Recently on this Blog I attempted to make a ‘comment’. What I was confronted with when I first clicked on the ‘comment’ box at the bottom of the post was indeed a surprise, some mindless waffle regarding typing ‘/’ to choose a ‘block’.
This is what you get when you attempt to ‘leave a reply’..

So wordpress apparently expect readers of my posts to understand this rubbish?
The so-called ‘Gutenburg’ block editor is defaulted throughout the editing interface of wordpress.
There have been suggestions online regarding the ‘editor’, none fulfil the task required – removal of this all-pervading nonsense from a ‘normal’ editing environment.
My intention is to ‘use up’ my current subscription, and then cancel wordpress.
Get this LOUD and CLEAR wordpress. I’ve written in HTML for many years, I’m NOT REMOTELY INTERESTED IN USING THE ABOMINATION ‘Gutenbug’ editor. NOR, foist this on commenters to my posts.

My little stick of Blackpool Rock

Admission. It was after reading the ineffable rubbish regarding Fatima, that I was reminded of other samples of the boundless crap touted by so-called ‘charities’, particularly those of a religious bent. Some considerable time ago, I read of the Church of America ‘curing’ gay men of their ‘pernicious behaviour’ and apparently making them straight. I presented my problem by email, and was a little surprised at the very negative response, I can’t think why.
So from back in 2009, first published on ‘Serial Failures’ is my account:

I’ve just come back after a visit to Blackpool and my partner was very angry with me when I presented her with a stick of Whitley Bay Rock. Let me explain, I promised her I’d bring her back a stick of Blackpool Rock and I forgot. Rather than ‘fess up, I called in to ‘The Candyman’ sweet shop on the way home and bought a stick of local rock (which has ‘Whitley Bay’ written all the way through it) thinking she wouldn’t notice, but of course she did. She stormed off in one of her tempers and her last words were – ‘keep your promise, and get me a stick of Blackpool Rock, or I’ll never speak to you again!’

I hunted around on the Internet and came across a Church in America that says that anything is possible if you try hard enough, so I emailed them regarding changing the lettering in the middle of my rock.

I was surprised and a little hurt when the Pastor replied to my email reprimanding me for my frivolous and disrespectful request.

Now I would have thought that if this Church can convert Gay men into Heterosexuals, it should be a cinch to sort out my Rock problem.

Whaddya Fink?

Fatima, Wherefore Art Thou?

Fátima, porque estás?

Tradução para Português
Proudly announced on the website of ‘The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Manila’ on Nov. 10th 2024.

As the worldwide Catholic Church prepares for the 100th anniversary celebration of the apparition to Our Lady of Fatima to The Venerable Sr. Lucia dos Santos in Pontevedra, Spain next year, the World Apostolate of Fatima (WAF) Philippines invites the faithful to take part on the National Fatima Convention on the Centenary of the Five First Saturday Devotion of December 10th 2024.’

Hmmm! Now I always thought, and was taught, that ‘Our Lady of Fatima’ referred to the ‘manifestation’ of the Virgin Mary to three girls in Fatima, Portugal. There is not one mention of that in this article.
‘Smacks’ to me like another copycat ‘apparition’ used to boost tourist income.

Wickipaedia has this: ‘Fátima is a Portuguese city located in Serra de Aire , headquarters of the Parish of Fátima of the Municipality of Ourém , in the former province of Beira Litoral , and in the current region Oeste e Vale do Tejo and NUT3 of Médio Tejo , a parish with 71.29 km² of area [ 1 ] and 13,212 inhabitants ( 2021 census ) [ 2 ] , therefore having a population density of 185.3 inhab./km².

Its worldwide fame is due to the phenomenon of the apparitions of the Virgin Mary reported by three shepherd children from May 13 to October 13 , 1917.

I also have another issue with the article, I quote ‘worldwide Catholic Church prepares for the 100th anniversary celebration of the apparition to Our Lady of Fatima to The Venerable Sr. Lucia dos Santos in Pontevedra, Spain’

Who wrote this rubbish?

For more ‘icing on the cake’, and slapping it on thick, read this: Apparitions at Pontevedra

Português
Orgulhosamente anunciado no site da ‘Arquidiocese Católica Romana de Manila’ a 10 de novembro de 2024

‘Enquanto a Igreja Católica mundial se prepara para a celebração do 100º aniversário da aparição de Nossa Senhora de Fátima à Venerável Irmã Lúcia dos Santos em Pontevedra, Espanha, no próximo ano, o Apostolado Mundial de Fátima (WAF) Filipinas convida os fiéis a participar sobre a Convenção Nacional de Fátima no Centenário dos Cinco Primeiros Sábados Devocionais de 10 de Dezembro de 2024.’

Hmmm! Ora sempre pensei, e ensinaram-me, que “Nossa Senhora de Fátima” se referia à “manifestação” da Virgem Maria a três meninas em Fátima, Portugal. Não há uma menção a isso neste artigo.
‘Parece-me’ como outra ‘aparição’ imitadora usada para aumentar o rendimento turístico.

A Wickipedia tem isto: ‘Fátima é uma cidade portuguesa situada na Serra de Aire, sede da Freguesia de Fátima do Concelho de Ourém, na antiga província da Beira Litoral, e na actual região Oeste e Vale do Tejo e NUT3 do Médio Tejo, freguesia com 71,29 km² de área[1] e 13.212 habitantes (censos 2021)[2], tendo portanto uma densidade populacional de 185,3 hab./km².

A sua fama mundial deve-se ao fenómeno das aparições da Virgem Maria relatadas por três pastorinhos de 13 de Maio a 13 de Outubro de 1917. ‘

Tenho também outro problema com o artigo, cito ‘A Igreja Católica mundial prepara-se para a celebração do 100º aniversário da aparição de Nossa Senhora de Fátima à Venerável Irmã Lúcia dos Santos em Pontevedra, Espanha’

Quem escreveu este lixo?

Para mais ‘cereja no topo do bolo’, e para dar um tapa na espessura, leia isto:Aparições em Pontevedra

National Fatima Convention to be held in Quezon City

If you wish to comment, simply ignore the shit about ‘blocks’ foisted on each post by wordpress, and simply type in your comment.

Se quiser comentar, simplesmente ignore a merda dos ‘bloqueios’ imposta em cada post pelo wordpress, e simplesmente digite o seu comentário.

Python: ‘Batteries included’ – but watch out for the ‘sell-by’ date.

There are at least two types of ‘patzer’ in the ‘Software Development’ domain, these two have caused me more hassle and annoyance than any other part of the mangled shit we have to deal with frequently:-

  • The complete innocent who ‘contributes’ an article and/or code project, without specifying the version and/or revision of the software environment on which his/her project depends.
  • The developer/maintainer who deletes/alters previously published library code, with nary a thought for whatever has been written for the previous version.

By far, the worst offenders are ‘contributors’ in the Python Development Community. Yes, things have changed, certainly for me.If anyone used to develop software on Microsoft’s ‘environment’, they will remember, probably with horror, the ‘DLL Hell’ everyone had to experience.
‘Things’ should have changed, but they haven’t, well not much.

In the above, just a few simple rules are required. The ‘developer’ does NOT delete/alter previously released functions. These should be supported but marked as ‘deprecated’. All too often the developer is making use of an ‘exposed’ interface him/herself. This is simply sloppy and lazy.
The ‘contributor’ simply provides the version and revision of his Python interpreter, and similar for the libraries he is using.

As is usual when there is ‘misunderstanding’ between folks speaking different languages, we could blame the interpreter.
Mostly, this is the root cause of the problem, with Python, and similar interpreters.

Several times I see ‘solutions’ involving downloading and building libraries from scratch on my own machine. So apparently I have to ‘manufacture’ my ‘batteries’? On such occasions I’m tempted to comment by suggesting that the ‘contributor’ finds a quiet corner, and stands with his face in it,
Well, no I’m not tempted to say that, but something quite different, but have no wish to offend.

Looking For A Rainbow?

Spotted this one a little North-West of Miranda-Do-Corvo, Central Portugal.
Always a great joy to behold, and a reminder of all the somewhat silly, but enchanting tales we both heard and read as children.
It is doubtful whether anyone ever found a ‘pot of gold’, or anything else after attempting to follow the ‘myths’, but that really doesn’t matter here, just the sheer majestic composition of white light being fully displayed.

Latterly the phrase ‘chasing a rainbow’ was exemplified in Chris Rea’s “Looking For A Rainbow’, a somewhat stark critique of the ‘Thatcher’ period of government in the UK. In my personal view, one that was absolutely apposite.

Well we come down to the valley.
Yea we’re looking for the honey.
I see a rainbow.
I say that’s the land of milk and honey.

Me and my cousin.
Me and my brother,
My little sister too.
Come looking for a rainbow.
Yea we’re looking for a rainbow.

Well we come down to the valley.
Got our babies in our arms.
Yea we’re Maggie’s little children,
And we’re looking for Maggie’s farm.

Me and my cousin.
Me and my brother.
My little sister too.
Come looking for a rainbow.
Yea we’re looking for a rainbow.

Well we come down to the valley.
We ain’t far away no more.
You can’t leave us dying this time,
’cause we’re all around your door.

Me and my cousin.
Me and my brother.
My little sister too,
Come looking for a rainbow.
Yea we’re looking for a rainbow.

(C) Christopher Anton Rea, Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC, Warner Chappell Music, Inc

Time Bandits Strike Again

Back in March 2010 I scribbled a post on my old joebrown blog about ‘losing’ a day. That article was about ‘perceived’ reality. Latterly, I’ve been reminded again, just how much I attempt to cram into my llfe, and the effects of doing so. A (still unfinished) tale now occupies over 200 pages of A4, and is chock full of ‘encounters’, spread over a period of several weeks.

The ‘timeline’ has to be correct, and I discovered a few days ago, I’d managed to ‘accelerate’ time and moved forward in the tale by one whole day.
The painstaking effort to ascertain the ‘problem’, and further how to ‘solve’ it, has meant some considerable time being spent – again, ‘robbing’ me of time.

I remembered the old blog, from a small collection of ‘The Occasional Diarist’ tales I had written. In this case the missive was named ‘The Revenge of The Time Bandits’. That the said ‘Bandits’ read my blog and simply waited patiently to ‘punish’ me is unlikely, but it is interesting that I have manifested my lack of grip over time in a work of fiction, as well as my ‘outages’ in real life.

I believe I have a solution, I won’t say what it is, which may spoil the story for you when it is published, should you read it.

The ‘old’ Time Bandits missive follows:

Tuesday March 16th 2010
I’ve been robbed! I’ve been robbed of one of the things most dear to me, of which I have only a finite amount left – a day!

Trouble is I’m still trying to work out which day has been stolen, as I only discovered the loss yesterday. I spent most of yesterday assuming it was Sunday 14th March, and only started to suspect something was wrong when reviewing the TV menu early evening, I saw that EastEnders was on at 8.00pm, but more importantly CSI Sunday on Five USA had apparently been cancelled. A check of the date on my PC confirmed my suspicions – a day had definitely gone AWOL.

I spent some time last night wandering around the house trying to recall what day I had carried out which tasks, but sadly I’m none the wiser. Fact is, extensive re-modelling of my office has been done and other than that, (which was well overdue) I can see precious little else in the way of achievements.

I tried re-constructing backwards in time, but this is so counter-intuitive to me I gave it up as a bad job. So I started with what I remember about the beginning of the week.

Now on Sunday (the 7th) I had to miss a concert at the Sage because of severe instability in my spine. Monday saw things getting worse with almost no respite from spinal spasms. I thought it couldn’t get worse, but Tuesday saw me finally being ferried to an emergency appointment at the Doctor’s surgery, because almost every movement caused me to grunt, groan or curse – almost like a sufferer from Terret’s syndrome.

My GP prescribed Morphine for the pain and Diazepam to help alleviate the spinal muscle spasms, and I have to admit that by 9.00 pm in the evening, things were bearable, and I had some mobility back without uttering profanities at each step.

I had made my mind up that whilst taking the narcotics, as well as not driving my car, I shouldn’t write any code either, as this would be probably write-only, (can’t understand it later) bugged beyond belief, and would probably have to be binned at a later date because it was deeply flawed. Not that any of the code is to control an Airbus, a Toyota car, or a Linear Accelerator mind, but it will be controlling stepper-motors in a CNC machine, so I have postponed working on it for now.

So instead of anything cerebral, I set about re-vamping the workshop/office. This has now become an annual task, as I re-factor the positions of equipment, wiring runs etc., so as to correct the infamous stove-pipe anti-pattern that the workshop/office becomes as it evolves to suit new projects/requirements.

Well, that was the intention anyway. Trouble is I’ve spent quite a long time sleeping. My 20-minute siestas had become 2-3 hours, and even awake I felt woozy – but pleasantly so, in a laid-back, what-the-hell way. Towards the end of the week (or what I thought was the end of the week) my back felt much better, and I reduced the doseage of both the Diazepam and Morphine, then the day following stopped taking them altogether and went back to my normal muscle-relaxant and analgesia products.

Somewhere in the middle of the above, the time bandits took advantage of my relaxed guard and crept in and stole a day.

Now I’ve double-checked both leaflets supplied with the medication, and there is no mention of any side-effects regarding time-bandit attacks. Perhaps this is a rare occurrence, perhaps the drug manufacturers don’t want to admit liability for time loss, or perhaps I needed the sleep? I suspect we’ll never know.


Belief in Divine Intervention shown to be worthless, so I’ve done this stuff myself.

Letters, Read Just One Last Time

First published on my earlier joebrown site in 2010

For many dark years, you could not open the cupboard, or the box in the safe. To leaf through the first few photographs would be enough to send you over the edge, to sit on the floor with them spread around you and cry like a lost child. But that was then. Taken from the cupboard you now have your lost life pinned up where you can see them all, celebrate them all. There is still grief, but it is manageable.

The box took longer, is still taking longer. The words in the first few letters become unreadable through ceaseless tears.
For a long time the temptation to simply tip the lot into a pile and burn them has been there, and that is what should happen, but you find that you cannot, but have made yourself a promise – before their immolation as a payment to hopefully halt your grief, you must read each of them just one last time.

To date September 2024, still not done. A ‘wallow’ is something I can definitely do without, given the last few dark, miserable, years.

One I did read again, that was never sent. Names changed.
Download or Read in Browser: The4thLetter

The Follies Of Saint-Palais-sur-Mer

First published on joebrown.org.uk on 2012/07/16
I turned, and we walked the short distance back to Carthowen’s overblown mansion, it’s grotesque kitsch borrowed from the styles of a hundred different worlds.
He halted suddenly when he saw Cilla and the hapless Carthowen, tethered by his neck ring to the rear of the saddle.
I laughed. “Don’t be afraid of her. She is here to protect you and take you home, so climb aboard.”
I waited until he was in the saddle, then climbed up after him, and whispered softly to Cilla. “Sbwriel yn Anwylyd, er ei fod yn rhoi drosedd i syllu arnynt.”
She turned her head to face the house and drew breath.

When she had finished, all that was left of Carthowen’s monstrous folly was a pile of incandescent rubble, and his anguished whimpering behind me.
I made no comment as we lifted into the air.


(From ‘Closed Circle‘ by the author)

It isn’t very often that I come across a house that I don’t like. Most appear aesthetically pleasing, some outstandingly attractive. The remainder are generally banal, even boring, but not usually causing me offense.

There is the odd building though, that sets off a physical wrinkling in my nose, a psychological jangling of broken bells in my head. Fortunately, I’ve found it easy to turn my head and look elsewhere, maybe at a more pleasing specimen. But what if you find yourself in a road, where every house looks like a badly reconstructed dog’s breakfast? Where do you look? What do you do now?
Well it did happen – some time ago, on a holiday in Vaux-sur-Mer. And I did do something – I took photographs of some of the hideous monstrosities as my girlfriend and I progressed down the road.

Now, several years later, I’m busy re-visiting photos, with a view to making these available for friends on the website, and I came across them.

This part of the French coastline, just north of Royan is a popular getaway for thousands of Frenchmen, amongst the richest of whom, have built themselves weekend homes.
Some of these homes draw on, and blend favourably with, the local building styles, and are both attractive and easy on the eye. Some of them sadly, are not, and reflect a tasteless and uninformed collage of styles ranging from la belle epoch to the present day, from almost every country in Europe, all rolled-up in one house. The result is ghastly, so bad that it’s completely hilarious.

Finally, I would like to add that there are two gorgeous beaches here, lots to see, plenty good food to be had, a lively market and very friendly people – a lovely place for a holiday in fact. (so the weekend French have got something right)

The ‘Follies’

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

M4011M-1402

A footnote. June, my girlfriend at the time, had remarked when we visited Royan, that everything had been built from the from the fifties onwards. I had made no remark other than to agree with her. To have ‘mentioned the war’ was not on my agenda.
I had talked later to a lovely lady friend who taught German in a college in Ely,and she had confirmed that several German friends had visited, as Royan was considered to be a ‘war grave’.
Indeed it was. Retrospective opinion regarded the complete devastation of Royan by ‘carpet’ bombing, including the use of napalm, to have been completely unnecessary, and the huge French and German casualties to be regarded as nothing short of a war crime.