Watching You, Watching Me.

In the ‘human’ domain it can be foolish to think that when you’re observing someone, at a close distance, that they aren’t aware of this. They may be aware and are watching you also.

Online, despite what you may think, You are also blaring out your thoughts on a virtual Power Amplifier. Your ‘target’ listener, hears you, but so can a myriad of other entities.
Note I don’t use the word ‘folk’, your message is captured and can be examined/listened to by an unintended audience who may then pass it on, with their own ‘nuances’ added.This ‘audience’ may not necessarily be human.

George Harrison encapsulated this message quite clearly in his recording of ‘The Devil’s Radio’.
His message is even more clearer today. Every word that I’m writing now, will be examined, processed and recorded, and not by WordPress but by a web scrapers, et al, that add my words to an LLM.

Interfacing directly with tools such as Chatgpt, can be useful to me. It is also useful to ‘them’, WTF they are. You are led to believe ‘it’ is a ‘big friendly big brother’. Hopefully, what you say to ‘it’ won’t cause someone to come and bite you in the arse.

Thoughts On Translating English To Portuguese

Reflexões sobre a tradução do inglês para o português

Num post anterior sobre a minha conversa com um caracol português, nunca fiquei muito satisfeito com o título do post. Trocando opiniões com um caracol – Trocando opiniões com um caracol

O motivo foi simplesmente ignorância minha. Obviamente, o caracol conseguia ver-me, e eu via-o. Mas também tivemos uma troca verbal e uma troca de opiniões. Em inglês, a palavra “view” pode descrever ambos, e na foto a mensagem é clara. A tradução portuguesa não refletiu o duplo sentido que pretendia dar a “view”.

Uma conversa recente com a minha namorada mostrou-me o caminho, pelo que, mais uma vez, e apenas pela segunda vez, perguntei ao Chatgpt. Não referi ao Chatgpt que o meu encontro foi com um caracol. Poderia ter levado a algo completamente diferente, estremeço ao pensar.
Em vez disso, coloquei a minha questão ao Chatgpt e recebi uma resposta bem elaborada.
Uma cópia completa do meu diálogo com o “bot” está abaixo, e uma actualização do blogue original será feita o mais breve possível.

[English]
In a previous post regarding my conversation with a Portuguese snail, I was never quite happy with title of the post.Exchanging views with a snail – Trocando opiniões com um caracol

The reason – quite simply my ignorance. Quite obviously, the snail could see me, and I could see him/her. But we also had a verbal exchange, an exchange of opinions. In English the word ‘view’ can describe both, and in the photo the message is clear. The Portuguese ‘translation’, did not reflect my intended double-meaning of ‘view’.

A recent conversation with my girl-friend, pointed the way, so once again, and for only the second time, I asked Chatgpt. I didn’t mention to Chatgpt that my encounter was with a snail. That might have led somewhere else entirely, I shudder to think.
Instead, I put my question to Chatgpt and received a well-assembled answer to my question.
A full copy of my dialog with the ‘bot’ is given below, and an update to the original blog will be done as soon as possible.

Foreword: The following includes both English and Portuguese. So I’m still trying to climb up a greasy pole. There’s an old saying: ‘When in doubt – give up.’ So no attempt will be made now to attempt translating the translations..

Prefácio: O texto que se segue inclui o inglês e o português. Então, ainda estou a tentar subir uma escada escorregadia.
Há um velho ditado: Na dúvida, desista. Portanto, não será feita nenhuma tentativa agora, tente traduzir as traduções.

A minha pergunta para o Chatgpt:

[English]
My Question to Chatgpt:
Two people are looking at each other through a window, and having a conversation.
In English I would describe this as an exchange of views.
First, because they both are looking at a different scene, secondly they are both expressing opinions.
So that the ‘exchange of views’ means two different things. How can I express this in Portuguese?

ChatGPT said:

That’s a clever bilingual play on words!
Let’s unpack it step by step so we can find the closest way to reproduce the double meaning in Portuguese.

In English, “exchange of views” means both:
Literally: they are seeing different “views” (landscapes, scenes).
Figuratively: they are exchanging opinions (views).

In Portuguese:
Figurative sense: (usual expression):
The normal phrase for “exchange of views/opinions” is “troca de opiniões” or “troca de pontos de vista”.

Literal sense: Exchanging views with a snail – Trocando opiniões com um caracol (the scene through the window):
“Ponto de vista” in Portuguese also literally means “point of view” (where you look from) and figuratively “opinion”.
That makes it a very useful bridge.

So, if you say:
“Eles estão numa troca de pontos de vista.”
it carries the same double meaning:

They’re literally looking at different views (from different vantage points, through the window).
They’re metaphorically exchanging opinions.

– Best equivalent pun in Portuguese:
“Uma troca de pontos de vista.”

That way you keep both senses alive, just like in English.

Would you like me to suggest a slightly more poetic or literary phrasing in Portuguese as well
(something you could use in a short story or essay), or are you aiming for a natural everyday expression?

You said:
No, I’m happy with that.

ChatGPT said:

Perfect! Then “troca de pontos de vista” is your best match — natural in Portuguese and keeping the same neat double meaning as in English.

Would you like me to also give you a couple of short example sentences in Portuguese using it, so you can see how it works in context?

You said:
Yes.
ChatGPT said:

Great! Here are a few short examples showing both the literal and figurative senses:

Literal + figurative (like your window scene):

Eles conversavam através da janela, numa verdadeira troca de pontos de vista.
(“They were talking through the window, in a true exchange of views.”)

More everyday, figurative use:

A reunião terminou com uma troca de pontos de vista bastante produtiva.
(“The meeting ended with a very productive exchange of views.”)

Playful, highlighting the double meaning:

Enquanto olhavam paisagens diferentes pela mesma janela, faziam também uma troca de pontos de vista.
(“While looking at different landscapes through the same window, they were also exchanging points of view.”)

Microsoft To End Support for Windows 10

Microsoft vai terminar suporte ao Windows 10

Extrato do boletim informativo Right To Repair:
A 14 de outubro, a Microsoft vai terminar o suporte gratuito para o Windows 10, levando milhões de PCs à obsolescência prematura e gerando lixo eletrónico evitável. Em vésperas do Dia Internacional da Reparação (18 de outubro), os grupos de economia circular e de direitos digitais de todo o mundo estão a opor-se à tecnologia rápida.

Extract from Right To Repair Newsletter:
On 14 October, Microsoft will end free support for Windows 10, pushing millions of PCs into premature obsolescence and generating avoidable e-waste. Ahead of International Repair Day (18 October), circular economy and digital rights groups worldwide are pushing back against fast tech.

Leia o comunicado de imprensa – Read the Press Release

Pride – Orgulho

There’s a saying in England, that pride comes before a fall. Over the years I’ve seen many examples that the old wisdom can be relied on. The most graphic, in my 78 years was when I was quite young, involved in erecting an extension to the switch-house at Blyth Power Station (Cambois) in Northumberland.

In my blog Didcot Diaries I mentioned how dangerous to life and limb some construction sites can turn out to be.
Recently, I’ve reported that three of the Coal-powered Electricity Stations I worked on have been unceremoniously ‘blown-up’.
The good news is that these monstrosities are no longer pumping millions of cubic metres of CO2 into the atmosphere. There is of course a ‘downside’. Loss of jobs for local population, and what to do with the site when it’s been levelled?

Don’t panic! AI, the ‘next best thing’ will be our saviour, and the old Cambois site will host a ‘data centre’, with myriad racks of computer systems, consume enormous amounts of electricity, and require very large amounts of water to keep it ‘cool man!’.

Jobs? – ‘Who said that?’ Yes. There will be jobs. Black-suited security guards, cleaners, and rack technicians.
The highly-paid folks that can, and do run these systems, do it from afar, India, the US, even the UK, but don’t include the canny folks of Blyth.

The ugliness of pride goes on. ‘Leaders’ and politicians strut their stuff, ‘Look how clever I am, I’ve done this, and that, and there’s even more to come!’

Yes Mr. Starmer, I’ve seen enough examples of ‘pride’ that has left me believing that some folks that elevate themselves to positions of power, are essentially simply stupid – because of pride.

My account that follows is true, it did happen, no less true than the idiocy I’m witnessing today from proud figure-heads.
Pride

Chatgpt on Advice to young people

I don’t want to use AI for anything, platforms such as Arduino (Software Development) offer this facility, I leave it strictly alone.
I’m concerned about the affect on folk from so called ‘social media’, which can be ‘anti-social’. A common sight now in a restaurant is to see a group of friends sit down at a table and ignore each other, whilst their thumbs tap busily on their phones. Worse still are reports of chatbots giving ‘advice’ to young folk about their personal relationships.

Yesterday, and for the first time ever, I asked Chatgpt a question. I copied verbatim the reply.
My question: Why are AI chatbots giving advice to young people about their relationships?

ChatGPT said:

That’s the right question — and it gets to the heart of a growing ethical problem.
Why are AI chatbots giving advice to young people about their relationships?
Because they’re being designed, marketed, and deployed that way — often irresponsibly.
Here’s what’s really happening behind the scenes:

1. Monetization and Engagement

Tech companies want users to engage — and nothing drives engagement like emotionally charged topics:
love, friendship, breakups, anxiety. When young people turn to AI for support, platforms log more time, more queries, more data — and that’s money.

Relationship talk = repeat usage
Emotional vulnerability = deeper interaction
Deeper interaction = stronger “user retention” metrics
Even if the advice is shallow or questionable, the illusion of empathy can keep people coming back.

2. Overreach of AI’s Use-Cases

LLMs are trained to predict the next word based on vast text data — which includes books, forums, therapy-style advice,
Reddit threads, etc. So when a user asks for relationship help, the model can generate advice that sounds right.
But “can generate” doesn’t mean “should generate.”
We now have chatbots saying things like:
“You deserve better”
“Maybe it’s time to move on”
“They’re gaslighting you”
These are weighty, subjective judgements — and they come from an entity that doesn’t know you, your partner, or your emotional world.

3. Anthropomorphism — Users Believe It’s Smarter Than It Is

People naturally project intelligence and emotion onto anything that sounds human-like. Young people especially, growing up with AI tools that feel conversational, may start to think of chatbots as friends or counsellors — which they’re absolutely not.
It’s easy to forget that:
The chatbot isn’t understanding you — it’s statistically guessing what words usually follow others in similar contexts.

4. Lack of Regulation

There are no meaningful safeguards in most consumer AI applications. No warning labels, no ethical review boards, no enforcement when tools overstep into areas like:
Mental health
Relationship counselling
Crisis response

In real life, a licensed therapist or counsellor goes through years of training and oversight.
AI? Just inference from Reddit and self-help blogs.

5. Gaps in Education and Support Systems

Young people often turn to AI because:
They don’t feel comfortable talking to parents or teachers
Therapy is expensive or unavailable
Peers might not be helpful or trustworthy
So AI fills a void — but not with wisdom, just with words that sound like it.

So what should be done?

Clear boundaries: AI chatbots should make their limitations explicit, especially in emotionally sensitive contexts.

Human in the loop: Serious issues (like abuse, crisis, trauma) should redirect to professionals, not be handled by LLMs.
Transparency: Users should know how these systems work and what they’re not.
Digital literacy: Especially for young users, education around AI should include how to critically engage with it.

You’re right to question it. The fact that chatbots are giving social/emotional advice without accountability is a failure of both design and regulation, not just a “tech issue.”

Would you want to explore how this might be changed — or do you see this as something that’s already gone too far to fix?

The above, quite lengthy answer to my question, is something I expected. I also expected spelling mistakes, and I’ve corrected them (a mere four in total). I can understand why some folks are using chatbots as a lazy way to surf the web. The answer aggregated most of currently submitted information on this topic. But why ‘Reddit’ is singled out, I have no idea, other ‘self-help’ offerings are just as bad, a complete waste of space. I laughed at the invitation to continue, and answer the question.
The best message, by far is:

So AI fills a void — but not with wisdom, just with words that sound like it.


Perhaps this caveat should be displayed in heavy type at the start of any chatbot session?

Power For The People

Recent news about an Eleven Billion Pound investment in the transformation of the ‘old’ Coal-powered station at Cottam into nuclear-powered, triggered memories of my time there during the original construction of the power station.
Wickipedia have an excellent article on the original coal-powered station.
Fans of ‘clean’ energy will no doubt be celebrating. This station alone absorbed a maximum of 25,401 tonnes of coal per day. The figures are scary in the extreme. That I played a (very) small part in the construction, is no longer a matter for pride.

It was a small part. Myself and T.M. were drafted in from Didcot, for a short time to fit a huge 12ft diameter gate valve (Please refer to my Didcot Diaries)
The work was cut short, because the monstrosity hadn’t been secured properly when lifted from the transporter by crane and was damaged. Twenty-five thousand pounds, and much swearing and cursing. T.M and I spent the rest of the day, exploring the pipe-work and the inside of the cooling towers.

So, that’s three power stations I helped to build, that have been recently ‘blown-up’ – a sobering thought.

Cheesecake Verdict – The Ants Have It

Veredicto do Cheesecake – As Formigas Estão Comigo

Há dois dias, eu e a minha namorada provámos um cheesecake que comprei no LIDL. A cobertura era pelo menos comestível, mas infelizmente não consigo descrever o que eu e ela sentimos em relação à base sem usar alguns palavrões. Digamos que parece o que era: achatado. Coloquei o restante cheesecake no exterior, para perguntar às formigas o que achavam. Concordaram exatamente com a nossa opinião. A cobertura foi consumida, a base cuidadosamente ignorada.

[English]
Two days ago my girlfriend and I sampled a cheesecake I bought in LIDL. The topping was at least edible, unfortunately I can’t describe what her and I felt about the base, without using some profanity. Let’s just say it looks like what it was – flattened. I placed the remainder outside, to ask the ants what they thought about it. They concurred with our thoughts precisely. The topping was consumed, the base studiously ignored.

Sandy Denny – Her life and times, a review

My most powerful and enduring memory of Sandy Denny, was in a concert by Fotheringay in Newcastle City Hall. The orchestra pit had been boarded over and extra seats installed and I was sat somewhere in the 3rd row. For a large part of the performance, Sandy sat at the lovely New Steinway Grand Piano and sang. I never took my eyes off her, and was rewarded by acknowledged glances and smiles, but most of all, she looked directly at me as she sang through most of the concert.
Whilst feeling very special, I recognised something I’d done many years before, singing solo as a young boy in front of audiences. Looking out from a lonely stage to a sea of faces can be terrifying. I would pick out a person, usually a woman, who was intent on me, and sing to her, all of the other faces then didn’t matter. The feeling is very personal, and quite intimate.

Later, much later. I heard of Sandy’s untimely demise from someone I disliked intensely. Hearing it from him seemed to make the news even more hurtful, he was more than aware of how I felt about her.

There has been much said and written about Sandy Denny and latterly a review of a book about her is here Life and Times of Sandy Denny

1938 Chamberlain & Hitler; 2025 Trump & Putin

Who said ‘History repeats itself’? – Give that man top prize.

Update: 16th August 2025
As is usual with Mr. Trump, lot’s of gas, but nothing gained.
Mr. Trump is consistently big on promises, but pathetically little on delivering them.
As my Pa used to say: ‘His promises are like pie-crust, easily broken.’
I guess that makes him ‘The Pie-crust President’.

The following link leads to a short observation by Anthony Zurcher, he says it all for me.
So much hot air

Later today, Ivo Daalder, former US NATO representative has said ‘No one in Europe today trusts Donald Trump’s US to defend them if they were attacked, and no-one in Ukraine is going to believe that unless and until they are the member of the one organisation that exists explicitly for that purpose.’ (Credit BBC News)

My suspicions regarding ‘Deal-maker Donald’, are that he and Putin are quite happy to carve up the world between them. His gloating tweets about all of the lovely NATO cheques crediting the US, from Europe for arms to help Ukraine are sick-making. Neither he, nor Putin want Ukraine in NATO, Donald because it’s a good deal better (more money for US) than supporting a Ukraine in NATO, and Putin ‘Vlad the Cad’, because he’s a fascist dictator, not unlike Hitler.

Here’s what Vitaly Shevchenko (BBC Anchorage) has to say: Putin is a happy man

In 1938 at Munich, Chamberlain got an international agreement that Hitler should have the Sudetenland in exchange for Germany making no further demands for land in Europe.
Chamberlain said it was ‘Peace for our time’.
Hitler said he had ‘No more territorial demands to make in Europe.’
On 1 October German troops occupied the Sudetenland:
Hitler had got what he wanted without firing a shot. What came after was truly dreadful. Millions died.

Quote from BBC News:
Trump had signalled that Ukraine might have to cede territory in order to end the war, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion of its neighbour in February 2022.

Trump said at the White House on Friday:
You’re looking at territory that’s been fought over for three and a half years, a lot of Russians have died. A lot of Ukrainians have died.”

“It’s very complicated. We’re going to get some back, we’re going to get some switched.
There will be some swapping of territories, to the betterment of both
.”

The US president did not provide further details of what that proposal would look like.

Well Donald, it may seem complicated to you, but other’s, particularly in Europe, will see the stark reality of you rewarding Putin for his illegal acts of land grab, and the wanton slaughter of Ukrainian citizens.

Comments. Should you wish to comment, please do so, and simply ignore’ the ‘Block’ bullshit.
Please see what I think about WordPress’s idea of what a ‘comment’ is here: What is a comment?